Skip to content
Utiloom

AI Crawler Policy Generator

Generate bounded robots.txt groups for current AI training, AI search, and optional user-requested crawler tokens without changing classic search policy.

LocalNo retention

Reviewed July 13, 2026

Guide, examples, and validation Show

About this tool

Build a reviewable robots.txt snippet that separates AI training controls from AI search discovery, applies bounded path rules, and leaves classic search groups untouched.

AI Crawler Policy Generator creates separate robots.txt groups for documented AI training controls, AI search crawlers, and optional user-requested fetchers. It deliberately avoids a User-agent: * group, so the generated snippet does not redefine classic search crawler policy.

  • Covers nine documented tokens across training controls, AI search crawlers, and optional user-requested fetchers.
  • Validates exact origins, absolute discovery URLs, path syntax, duplicates, conflicts, and exception coverage before enabling export.
  • Emits a standard Sitemap directive and treats llms.txt only as an ignored explanatory comment, not a robots.txt directive.
  • Exports the generated snippet and versioned JSON evidence while stating merge, deployment, identity, indexing, and compliance limits.

How to use AI Crawler Policy

Choose training and AI search access separately, decide whether to include user-requested fetchers, enter the exact site origin, and list protected path prefixes with any more-specific exceptions. Resolve every validation error, review warnings and token coverage, then merge the downloaded snippet into the existing root robots.txt after checking group interactions.

When this tool is useful

  • Before publishing a new robots.txt policy after an AI search or AdSense quality reset.
  • When deciding whether to allow AI search crawlers while blocking model-training crawlers.
  • After adding or changing a sitemap, protected path prefixes, or an optional llms.txt reference.

Practical tips

  • Do not block all AI crawlers unless you accept reduced visibility in assistant search experiences.
  • Keep private paths protected by authentication; robots.txt is not access control.
  • Treat Sitemap as a discovery directive and llms.txt only as a non-standard comment in this generated snippet.
  • Do not assume user-requested fetchers obey robots.txt; review each provider's current documentation.

Examples you can test

Load an example, compare the result with the expected output, then replace it with your own input.

Block model training while keeping AI search discovery

Example input

Training: Block
AI search: Allow
Protected paths: /api/, /admin/, /private/
Sitemap: https://example.com/sitemap-index.xml

Expected output

GPTBot, Google-Extended, and ClaudeBot receive Disallow: /. OAI-SearchBot, Claude-SearchBot, and PerplexityBot receive the protected path rules.

This is often the most balanced policy for a site that wants search visibility without broadly allowing training crawlers.

Avoid accidental AI search opt-out

Example input

Training: Block
AI search: Block
Goal: improve AI search visibility

Expected output

Warning: broad blocking conflicts with the stated visibility goal. Use the training-only blocking mode instead.

Crawler names are increasingly purpose-specific, so a single broad block can create unintended discovery loss.

Validation checklist

  • Confirm every protected path is also protected server-side if the content is sensitive.
  • Verify that referenced sitemap and llms.txt URLs return the intended response before publishing the policy.
  • Merge the snippet with the current root robots.txt and check duplicate user-agent group behavior.
  • Check official crawler documentation for current user-agent tokens before deployment.
  • Use Search Console and server logs after deployment to confirm important pages remain crawlable.

Frequently asked questions

Why separate AI training crawlers from AI search crawlers?

Some crawler tokens are meant for model training control while others affect AI search, assistant retrieval, or user-initiated fetches. Separating them helps protect content use preferences without accidentally reducing discovery.

Does blocking Google-Extended remove my site from Google Search?

Google documents Google-Extended as a standalone product token for Gemini-related training and grounding controls, and says it does not affect inclusion or ranking in Google Search.

Should I block OAI-SearchBot?

Only if you intentionally want to opt out of OpenAI search crawling. OpenAI documents OAI-SearchBot as the crawler to use for Search opt outs and automatic crawl management.

Are robots.txt rules a security mechanism?

No. robots.txt is a voluntary crawler directive. Keep private, account, admin, draft, and API content protected with authentication or server-side access controls.

Will user-requested assistant fetchers obey these rules?

Not necessarily. OpenAI says robots.txt may not apply to ChatGPT-User, while Perplexity says Perplexity-User generally ignores it. The generator omits this group by default and warns when it is included.

Related tools

Keep the workflow moving

Continue with tools that handle a related input, output, or validation step.

SEO

Faceted Navigation Indexability Checker

Review faceted URL policy evidence locally.

Local
SEO

FAQ Schema Generator

Build and validate FAQPage JSON-LD locally.

Local
SEO

Internal Link Checker

Inspect authored links and page-level inventory coverage.

Local
SEO

LLMs.txt Generator

Build and validate proposal-aligned llms.txt Markdown.

Local